Endava vs Version 1: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (3.3/5) edges ahead of Version 1 (3.2/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory. Version 1 is the stronger option for enterprises wanting an Ireland/UK-anchored management consultancy for AI digital transformation. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Version 1: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Version 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 1996 |
| HQ | London, UK | Dublin, Ireland |
| Team size | 11225 | 3000+ |
| Rating | 3.3 / 5 | 3.2 / 5 |
| Best for | Enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory | Enterprises wanting an Ireland/UK-anchored management consultancy for AI digital transformation |
| Pricing model | Retainer, dedicated team, T&M | Retainer, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $100K | $60K |
| Primary tech stack | AWS, Azure, Kubernetes | AWS, Azure |
| Industries served | Fintech, Retail, Telecom | Fintech, Retail, Healthcare |
Endava vs Version 1: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 by John Cotterell in London and is headquartered there, with 11,225 total employees. The company is a publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) technology services firm offering strategy consulting, data insights, systems architecture, automation, software engineering, cloud computing, and AI technology consulting.
Version 1
Version 1 was founded in 1996 and is headquartered in Dublin, Ireland, with additional offices in London, New York, and Chicago, and 3,000+ employees. The firm provides management consulting, managed services, and software development, and positions itself as a leader in AI and digital transformation, partnering with global organizations to adopt AI technology.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Version 1
| Capability | Endava | Version 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise automation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agent orchestration | ✗ | ✗ |
| RAG & knowledge agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| Data & analytics agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| LLM integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow integration | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Version 1
| Framework / platform | Endava | Version 1 |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Version 1
| Criterion | Endava | Version 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $100K | $60K |
| Engagement models | Retainer, Dedicated team, T&M | Retainer, Dedicated team, T&M |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Version 1
| Dimension | Endava | Version 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Fintech, Retail, Telecom | Fintech, Retail, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Enterprise AI technology consulting, Large-scale systems architecture advisory | Management consulting for AI adoption, Multi-national digital transformation advisory |
| Typical project type | Retainer | Retainer |
Endava vs Version 1: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with audited financial transparency |
| + | 25+ years of technology consulting history spanning strategy through delivery |
| + | UK headquarters simplifies engagement for European enterprise buyers |
| - | Large-firm structure means less boutique-style senior-partner attention on smaller engagements |
| - | High minimum engagement puts it out of reach for smaller buyers |
| Version 1 | |
|---|---|
| + | 28+ years of management consulting and digital transformation history |
| + | 3,000+ employees support sizeable multi-national enterprise programs |
| + | Dublin HQ with London/New York/Chicago offices suits transatlantic enterprise buyers |
| - | Large-firm structure means less boutique-style senior-partner attention on smaller engagements |
| - | AI agent-specific case studies are less prominent than its broader management-consulting portfolio |
Who should choose Endava?
Endava is the right choice for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory.
Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with a UK headquarters, useful for EU/UK-anchored enterprise buyers. Minimum engagement starts at $100K. Works best with clients in Fintech, Retail, Telecom.
Who should choose Version 1?
Version 1 is the right choice for enterprises wanting an Ireland/UK-anchored management consultancy for AI digital transformation.
Dublin headquarters gives it a distinct Irish/UK/US multinational footprint among this roster's large consultancies. Minimum engagement starts at $60K. Works best with clients in Fintech, Retail, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Version 1
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Version 1 |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Version 1
| Use case | Endava fit | Version 1 fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise AI technology consulting | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Large-scale systems architecture advisory | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| Management consulting for AI adoption | Limited | Strong | Version 1 |
| Multi-national digital transformation advisory | Limited | Strong | Version 1 |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Version 1
Endava (3.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent projects. Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with a UK headquarters, useful for EU/UK-anchored enterprise buyers. It is best for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory.
Version 1 (3.2/5) is the better choice when enterprises wanting an Ireland/UK-anchored management consultancy for AI digital transformation. If your situation matches those criteria, Version 1 is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Version 1 FAQ
Is Endava better than Version 1?
Endava (3.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava is better for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory. Version 1 is better for enterprises wanting an Ireland/UK-anchored management consultancy for AI digital transformation.
How do Endava and Version 1 differ in pricing?
Endava uses retainer, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $100K. Version 1 uses retainer, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $60K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Version 1?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each consultancy before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Version 1?
Endava's primary differentiator is: publicly traded (nyse: dava) with a uk headquarters, useful for eu/uk-anchored enterprise buyers. Version 1's primary differentiator is: dublin headquarters gives it a distinct irish/uk/us multinational footprint among this roster's large consultancies. They also differ in team size (11225 vs 3000+), minimum engagement ($100K vs $60K), and primary industries served (Fintech, Retail vs Fintech, Retail).