EPAM Systems vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
EPAM Systems (3.3/5) edges ahead of Endava (3.3/5) overall. EPAM Systems is the better choice for global enterprises wanting the largest public engineering-consultancy bench. Endava is the stronger option for enterprises wanting a publicly-traded UK consultancy for AI advisory. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
EPAM Systems vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 | 2000 |
| HQ | Newtown, PA, USA | London, UK |
| Team size | 60000+ | 11225 |
| Rating | 3.3 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Gartner-recognized GenAI consulting leader with 64,000+ employees, the largest single firm in this roster | Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with a UK headquarters, useful for EU/UK-anchored enterprise buyers |
| Pricing model | Retainer, dedicated team, T&M | Retainer, dedicated team, T&M |
| Min. engagement | $150K | $100K |
| Primary tech stack | AWS, Azure, GCP | AWS, Azure, Kubernetes |
| Industries served | Fintech, Retail, Healthcare, Telecom | Fintech, Retail, Telecom |
EPAM Systems vs Endava: overview
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania, with 64,018 employees worldwide as of March 2026, trading publicly on the NYSE. The firm integrates advanced AI technologies through platforms like EPAM AI/RUN and initiatives like Agentic QA, and has been named a GenAI Consulting & Implementation Services leader by Gartner.
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 by John Cotterell in London and is headquartered there, with 11,225 total employees. The company is a publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) technology services firm offering strategy consulting, data insights, systems architecture, automation, software engineering, cloud computing, and AI technology consulting.
Services and capabilities: EPAM Systems vs Endava
| Capability | EPAM Systems | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise automation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agent orchestration | ✓ | ✗ |
| RAG & knowledge agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| Data & analytics agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| LLM integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow integration | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: EPAM Systems vs Endava
| Framework / platform | EPAM Systems | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: EPAM Systems vs Endava
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $150K | $100K |
| Engagement models | Retainer, Dedicated team, T&M | Retainer, Dedicated team, T&M |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: EPAM Systems vs Endava
| Dimension | EPAM Systems | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Fintech, Retail, Healthcare | Fintech, Retail, Telecom |
| Best use cases | Global GenAI consulting programs, Enterprise agent QA and monitoring | Enterprise AI technology consulting, Large-scale systems architecture advisory |
| Typical project type | Retainer | Retainer |
EPAM Systems vs Endava: pros and cons
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly traded (NYSE) with the largest workforce (64,000+) of any firm in this roster |
| + | Gartner-recognized as a GenAI Consulting & Implementation Services leader |
| + | Distributed delivery model across 50+ countries supports global follow-the-sun programs |
| - | Very high minimum engagement puts it out of reach for all but the largest enterprise buyers |
| - | Massive scale means essentially no boutique-style senior-partner attention |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with audited financial transparency |
| + | 25+ years of technology consulting history spanning strategy through delivery |
| + | UK headquarters simplifies engagement for European enterprise buyers |
| - | Large-firm structure means less boutique-style senior-partner attention on smaller engagements |
| - | High minimum engagement puts it out of reach for smaller buyers |
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: global GenAI consulting programs.
Gartner-recognized GenAI consulting leader with 64,000+ employees, the largest single firm in this roster. Minimum engagement starts at $150K. Works best with clients in Fintech, Retail, Healthcare, Telecom.
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: enterprise AI technology consulting.
Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with a UK headquarters, useful for EU/UK-anchored enterprise buyers. Minimum engagement starts at $100K. Works best with clients in Fintech, Retail, Telecom.
Decision matrix: EPAM Systems vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | EPAM Systems |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Endava |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: EPAM Systems vs Endava
| Use case | EPAM Systems fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global GenAI consulting programs | Strong | Limited | EPAM Systems |
| Enterprise agent QA and monitoring | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Enterprise AI technology consulting | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Large-scale systems architecture advisory | Limited | Strong | Endava |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: EPAM Systems vs Endava
EPAM Systems (3.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent projects. Gartner-recognized GenAI consulting leader with 64,000+ employees, the largest single firm in this roster.
Endava (3.3/5) is worth a look if you need large-scale systems architecture advisory. If your situation matches that, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
EPAM Systems vs Endava FAQ
Is EPAM Systems better than Endava?
EPAM Systems (3.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: publicly traded (NYSE) with the largest workforce (64,000+) of any firm in this roster. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with audited financial transparency.
How do EPAM Systems and Endava differ in pricing?
EPAM Systems uses retainer, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $150K. Endava uses retainer, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $100K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: EPAM Systems or Endava?
EPAM Systems is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each consultancy before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between EPAM Systems and Endava?
EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: gartner-recognized GenAI consulting leader with 64,000+ employees, the largest single firm in this roster. Endava's primary differentiator is: publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with a UK headquarters, useful for EU/UK-anchored enterprise buyers. They also differ in team size (60000+ vs 11225), minimum engagement ($150K vs $100K), and primary industries served (Fintech, Retail vs Fintech, Retail).