Grid Dynamics vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Grid Dynamics (3.8/5) edges ahead of Endava (3.3/5) overall. Grid Dynamics is the better choice for large enterprises needing public-company scale, compliance rigor, and global advisory-plus-delivery capacity. Endava is the stronger option for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Grid Dynamics vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Grid Dynamics | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2006 | 2000 |
| HQ | San Ramon, CA, USA | London, UK |
| Team size | 1000+ | 11225 |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Best for | Large enterprises needing public-company scale, compliance rigor, and global advisory-plus-delivery capacity | Enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory |
| Pricing model | Retainer, dedicated team, T&M | Retainer, dedicated team, T&M |
| Min. engagement | $100K | $100K |
| Primary tech stack | Temporal, AWS, GCP | AWS, Azure, Kubernetes |
| Industries served | Retail, Telecom, Manufacturing, Fintech | Fintech, Retail, Telecom |
Grid Dynamics vs Endava: overview
Grid Dynamics
Grid Dynamics was founded in 2006 by Victoria Livschitz and is a publicly traded company (Nasdaq: GDYN) headquartered in the San Ramon/Fremont area of California, with over 4,500 employees globally. The company partnered with Temporal Technologies to launch an agentic AI platform aimed at enterprise-scale deployments.
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 by John Cotterell in London and is headquartered there, with 11,225 total employees. The company is a publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) technology services firm offering strategy consulting, data insights, systems architecture, automation, software engineering, cloud computing, and AI technology consulting.
Services and capabilities: Grid Dynamics vs Endava
| Capability | Grid Dynamics | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise automation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agent orchestration | ✓ | ✗ |
| RAG & knowledge agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| Data & analytics agents | ✓ | ✗ |
| LLM integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow integration | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Grid Dynamics vs Endava
| Framework / platform | Grid Dynamics | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Grid Dynamics vs Endava
| Criterion | Grid Dynamics | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $100K | $100K |
| Engagement models | Retainer, Dedicated team, T&M | Retainer, Dedicated team, T&M |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Grid Dynamics vs Endava
| Dimension | Grid Dynamics | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Retail, Telecom, Manufacturing | Fintech, Retail, Telecom |
| Best use cases | Enterprise-scale agentic AI advisory, Global digital engineering transformation | Enterprise AI technology consulting, Large-scale systems architecture advisory |
| Typical project type | Retainer | Retainer |
Grid Dynamics vs Endava: pros and cons
| Grid Dynamics | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company financial transparency and audited scale (4,500+ employees) |
| + | Enterprise-grade advisory-plus-delivery capacity for multi-region programs |
| + | Formal agentic AI platform partnership with Temporal Technologies |
| - | Large-generalist structure means less boutique-style senior-only attention than smaller specialists |
| - | Higher minimum engagement puts it out of reach for smaller buyers |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with audited financial transparency |
| + | 25+ years of technology consulting history spanning strategy through delivery |
| + | UK headquarters simplifies engagement for European enterprise buyers |
| - | Large-firm structure means less boutique-style senior-partner attention on smaller engagements |
| - | High minimum engagement puts it out of reach for smaller buyers |
Who should choose Grid Dynamics?
Grid Dynamics is the right choice for large enterprises needing public-company scale, compliance rigor, and global advisory-plus-delivery capacity.
Publicly traded (Nasdaq: GDYN) with 4,500+ engineers — unmatched scale and financial transparency in this roster. Minimum engagement starts at $100K. Works best with clients in Retail, Telecom, Manufacturing, Fintech.
Who should choose Endava?
Endava is the right choice for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory.
Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with a UK headquarters, useful for EU/UK-anchored enterprise buyers. Minimum engagement starts at $100K. Works best with clients in Fintech, Retail, Telecom.
Decision matrix: Grid Dynamics vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Grid Dynamics |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Grid Dynamics |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Grid Dynamics |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Grid Dynamics vs Endava
| Use case | Grid Dynamics fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise-scale agentic AI advisory | Strong | Limited | Grid Dynamics |
| Global digital engineering transformation | Strong | Limited | Grid Dynamics |
| Enterprise AI technology consulting | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Large-scale systems architecture advisory | Limited | Strong | Endava |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Grid Dynamics vs Endava
Grid Dynamics (3.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent projects. Publicly traded (Nasdaq: GDYN) with 4,500+ engineers — unmatched scale and financial transparency in this roster. It is best for large enterprises needing public-company scale, compliance rigor, and global advisory-plus-delivery capacity.
Endava (3.3/5) is the better choice when enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory. If your situation matches those criteria, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Grid Dynamics vs Endava FAQ
Is Grid Dynamics better than Endava?
Grid Dynamics (3.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Grid Dynamics is better for large enterprises needing public-company scale, compliance rigor, and global advisory-plus-delivery capacity. Endava is better for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory.
How do Grid Dynamics and Endava differ in pricing?
Grid Dynamics uses retainer, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $100K. Endava uses retainer, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $100K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Grid Dynamics or Endava?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each consultancy before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Grid Dynamics and Endava?
Grid Dynamics's primary differentiator is: publicly traded (nasdaq: gdyn) with 4,500+ engineers — unmatched scale and financial transparency in this roster. Endava's primary differentiator is: publicly traded (nyse: dava) with a uk headquarters, useful for eu/uk-anchored enterprise buyers. They also differ in team size (1000+ vs 11225), minimum engagement ($100K vs $100K), and primary industries served (Retail, Telecom vs Fintech, Retail).