Innowise vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Innowise (3.4/5) edges ahead of Endava (3.3/5) overall. Innowise is the better choice for buyers wanting large-scale offshore advisory-plus-delivery capacity with an AI agent specialty unit. Endava is the stronger option for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Innowise vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Innowise | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2000 |
| HQ | Warsaw, Poland | London, UK |
| Team size | 1000+ | 11225 |
| Rating | 3.4 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Best for | Buyers wanting large-scale offshore advisory-plus-delivery capacity with an AI agent specialty unit | Enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, staff augmentation | Retainer, dedicated team, T&M |
| Min. engagement | $25K | $100K |
| Primary tech stack | LangChain, OpenAI, AWS | AWS, Azure, Kubernetes |
| Industries served | Fintech, Healthcare, Retail, Manufacturing | Fintech, Retail, Telecom |
Innowise vs Endava: overview
Innowise
Innowise was founded in 2007 and is headquartered in Warsaw, Poland, with over 3,500 professionals across offices in Europe, North America, and Asia. The company's AI Hub covers AI advisory, machine learning, generative AI, AI agents, and enterprise automation, and the firm reports delivering more than 1,600 projects to date.
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 by John Cotterell in London and is headquartered there, with 11,225 total employees. The company is a publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) technology services firm offering strategy consulting, data insights, systems architecture, automation, software engineering, cloud computing, and AI technology consulting.
Services and capabilities: Innowise vs Endava
| Capability | Innowise | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise automation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Agent orchestration | ✗ | ✗ |
| RAG & knowledge agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| Data & analytics agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| LLM integration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Workflow integration | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Innowise vs Endava
| Framework / platform | Innowise | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | N/A |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | ✓ | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Innowise vs Endava
| Criterion | Innowise | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $25K | $100K |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Staff augmentation, Fixed project | Retainer, Dedicated team, T&M |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Innowise vs Endava
| Dimension | Innowise | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Fintech, Healthcare, Retail | Fintech, Retail, Telecom |
| Best use cases | Enterprise AI agent advisory, Large-team AI development programs | Enterprise AI technology consulting, Large-scale systems architecture advisory |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Retainer |
Innowise vs Endava: pros and cons
| Innowise | |
|---|---|
| + | Very large delivery bench (3,500+) supports rapid team scaling |
| + | 1,600+ completed projects demonstrate broad advisory-and-delivery experience |
| + | Dedicated AI Hub separates agent specialists from general software staff |
| - | AI agent advisory is one specialty unit inside a much larger general software company |
| - | Very large scale can mean less individualized senior-partner attention than a boutique |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with audited financial transparency |
| + | 25+ years of technology consulting history spanning strategy through delivery |
| + | UK headquarters simplifies engagement for European enterprise buyers |
| - | Large-firm structure means less boutique-style senior-partner attention on smaller engagements |
| - | High minimum engagement puts it out of reach for smaller buyers |
Who should choose Innowise?
Innowise is the right choice for buyers wanting large-scale offshore advisory-plus-delivery capacity with an AI agent specialty unit.
3,500+ person full-cycle software firm with a dedicated internal AI Hub, not a small AI-only shop. Minimum engagement starts at $25K. Works best with clients in Fintech, Healthcare, Retail, Manufacturing.
Who should choose Endava?
Endava is the right choice for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory.
Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with a UK headquarters, useful for EU/UK-anchored enterprise buyers. Minimum engagement starts at $100K. Works best with clients in Fintech, Retail, Telecom.
Decision matrix: Innowise vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Innowise |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Innowise |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Innowise |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Innowise |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Innowise vs Endava
| Use case | Innowise fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise AI agent advisory | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Large-team AI development programs | Strong | Limited | Innowise |
| Enterprise AI technology consulting | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Large-scale systems architecture advisory | Limited | Strong | Endava |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Innowise vs Endava
Innowise (3.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent projects. 3,500+ person full-cycle software firm with a dedicated internal AI Hub, not a small AI-only shop. It is best for buyers wanting large-scale offshore advisory-plus-delivery capacity with an AI agent specialty unit.
Endava (3.3/5) is the better choice when enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory. If your situation matches those criteria, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Innowise vs Endava FAQ
Is Innowise better than Endava?
Innowise (3.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Innowise is better for buyers wanting large-scale offshore advisory-plus-delivery capacity with an AI agent specialty unit. Endava is better for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory.
How do Innowise and Endava differ in pricing?
Innowise uses dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K. Endava uses retainer, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $100K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Innowise or Endava?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each consultancy before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Innowise and Endava?
Innowise's primary differentiator is: 3,500+ person full-cycle software firm with a dedicated internal ai hub, not a small ai-only shop. Endava's primary differentiator is: publicly traded (nyse: dava) with a uk headquarters, useful for eu/uk-anchored enterprise buyers. They also differ in team size (1000+ vs 11225), minimum engagement ($25K vs $100K), and primary industries served (Fintech, Healthcare vs Fintech, Retail).