Matellio vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Matellio (3.5/5) edges ahead of Endava (3.3/5) overall. Matellio is the better choice for enterprises wanting AI agent advisory alongside a larger custom software modernization project. Endava is the stronger option for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Matellio vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Matellio | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2000 |
| HQ | San Jose, CA, USA | London, UK |
| Team size | 101-250 | 11225 |
| Rating | 3.5 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Best for | Enterprises wanting AI agent advisory alongside a larger custom software modernization project | Enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Retainer, dedicated team, T&M |
| Min. engagement | $25K | $100K |
| Primary tech stack | OpenAI, LangChain, AWS | AWS, Azure, Kubernetes |
| Industries served | Fintech, Healthcare, Manufacturing | Fintech, Retail, Telecom |
Matellio vs Endava: overview
Matellio
Matellio was founded in 2014 by Dilip Singh and Apoorv Gehlot and is headquartered in San Jose, California, with a global presence including the UK, France, and Germany. Employee counts range from roughly 147 to 250+ across sources, and the firm advises on and builds custom AI agents as part of a broader enterprise software development practice.
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 by John Cotterell in London and is headquartered there, with 11,225 total employees. The company is a publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) technology services firm offering strategy consulting, data insights, systems architecture, automation, software engineering, cloud computing, and AI technology consulting.
Services and capabilities: Matellio vs Endava
| Capability | Matellio | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise automation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agent orchestration | ✗ | ✗ |
| RAG & knowledge agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| Data & analytics agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| LLM integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow integration | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Matellio vs Endava
| Framework / platform | Matellio | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | N/A |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | ✓ | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Matellio vs Endava
| Criterion | Matellio | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $25K | $100K |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, T&M | Retainer, Dedicated team, T&M |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Matellio vs Endava
| Dimension | Matellio | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Fintech, Healthcare, Manufacturing | Fintech, Retail, Telecom |
| Best use cases | Enterprise software modernization advisory, Workflow automation agent strategy | Enterprise AI technology consulting, Large-scale systems architecture advisory |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Retainer |
Matellio vs Endava: pros and cons
| Matellio | |
|---|---|
| + | True multi-country European delivery footprint (UK, France, Germany), not just one offshore hub |
| + | Enterprise software development pedigree supports agent advisory embedded in larger systems |
| + | US headquarters simplifies contracting for North American buyers |
| - | AI agent advisory is one line within a broader enterprise software practice, not the company's sole focus |
| - | Employee-count estimates vary meaningfully across sources (147 to 250+) |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with audited financial transparency |
| + | 25+ years of technology consulting history spanning strategy through delivery |
| + | UK headquarters simplifies engagement for European enterprise buyers |
| - | Large-firm structure means less boutique-style senior-partner attention on smaller engagements |
| - | High minimum engagement puts it out of reach for smaller buyers |
Who should choose Matellio?
Matellio is the right choice for enterprises wanting AI agent advisory alongside a larger custom software modernization project.
US-HQ enterprise software firm with true multi-country delivery (UK, France, Germany) beyond a single offshore hub. Minimum engagement starts at $25K. Works best with clients in Fintech, Healthcare, Manufacturing.
Who should choose Endava?
Endava is the right choice for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory.
Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with a UK headquarters, useful for EU/UK-anchored enterprise buyers. Minimum engagement starts at $100K. Works best with clients in Fintech, Retail, Telecom.
Decision matrix: Matellio vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Matellio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Matellio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Matellio |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Matellio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Matellio vs Endava
| Use case | Matellio fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise software modernization advisory | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Workflow automation agent strategy | Strong | Limited | Matellio |
| Enterprise AI technology consulting | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Large-scale systems architecture advisory | Limited | Strong | Endava |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Matellio vs Endava
Matellio (3.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent projects. US-HQ enterprise software firm with true multi-country delivery (UK, France, Germany) beyond a single offshore hub. It is best for enterprises wanting AI agent advisory alongside a larger custom software modernization project.
Endava (3.3/5) is the better choice when enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory. If your situation matches those criteria, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Matellio vs Endava FAQ
Is Matellio better than Endava?
Matellio (3.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Matellio is better for enterprises wanting AI agent advisory alongside a larger custom software modernization project. Endava is better for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory.
How do Matellio and Endava differ in pricing?
Matellio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K. Endava uses retainer, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $100K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Matellio or Endava?
Matellio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each consultancy before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Matellio and Endava?
Matellio's primary differentiator is: us-hq enterprise software firm with true multi-country delivery (uk, france, germany) beyond a single offshore hub. Endava's primary differentiator is: publicly traded (nyse: dava) with a uk headquarters, useful for eu/uk-anchored enterprise buyers. They also differ in team size (101-250 vs 11225), minimum engagement ($25K vs $100K), and primary industries served (Fintech, Healthcare vs Fintech, Retail).