Signity Solutions vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Signity Solutions (3.6/5) edges ahead of Endava (3.3/5) overall. Signity Solutions is the better choice for cost-conscious buyers wanting full AI-first advisory, not just a legacy web shop with an AI label. Endava is the stronger option for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Signity Solutions vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Signity Solutions | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 2000 |
| HQ | Mohali, Punjab, India | London, UK |
| Team size | 201-250 | 11225 |
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Best for | Cost-conscious buyers wanting full AI-first advisory, not just a legacy web shop with an AI label | Enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, T&M | Retainer, dedicated team, T&M |
| Min. engagement | $10K | $100K |
| Primary tech stack | OpenAI, LangChain, AWS | AWS, Azure, Kubernetes |
| Industries served | Retail, SaaS, Healthcare | Fintech, Retail, Telecom |
Signity Solutions vs Endava: overview
Signity Solutions
Signity Solutions was founded in 2009 as a web development company and is headquartered in Mohali, Punjab, India, with 203 employees. The firm evolved into an AI-first digital transformation partner, offering AI strategy, generative AI, agentic AI, RAG, custom LLM integration, and MLOps advisory.
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 by John Cotterell in London and is headquartered there, with 11,225 total employees. The company is a publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) technology services firm offering strategy consulting, data insights, systems architecture, automation, software engineering, cloud computing, and AI technology consulting.
Services and capabilities: Signity Solutions vs Endava
| Capability | Signity Solutions | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise automation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Agent orchestration | ✗ | ✗ |
| RAG & knowledge agents | ✓ | ✗ |
| Data & analytics agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| LLM integration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Workflow integration | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Signity Solutions vs Endava
| Framework / platform | Signity Solutions | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | N/A |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | ✓ | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Signity Solutions vs Endava
| Criterion | Signity Solutions | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $10K | $100K |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, T&M, Staff augmentation | Retainer, Dedicated team, T&M |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Signity Solutions vs Endava
| Dimension | Signity Solutions | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Retail, SaaS, Healthcare | Fintech, Retail, Telecom |
| Best use cases | RAG-based knowledge agent advisory, Custom LLM integration strategy | Enterprise AI technology consulting, Large-scale systems architecture advisory |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Retainer |
Signity Solutions vs Endava: pros and cons
| Signity Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | 15+ years of company history provides advisory stability beyond a pure AI-era startup |
| + | Distinct MLOps practice supports agent advisory that accounts for production monitoring |
| + | Competitive pricing relative to US/EU-HQ competitors |
| - | Web-development origins mean deep agent-advisory specialization is a more recent addition |
| - | Reported HQ location varies between Punjab and New Jersey across sources — confirm legal HQ directly |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with audited financial transparency |
| + | 25+ years of technology consulting history spanning strategy through delivery |
| + | UK headquarters simplifies engagement for European enterprise buyers |
| - | Large-firm structure means less boutique-style senior-partner attention on smaller engagements |
| - | High minimum engagement puts it out of reach for smaller buyers |
Who should choose Signity Solutions?
Signity Solutions is the right choice for cost-conscious buyers wanting full AI-first advisory, not just a legacy web shop with an AI label.
Documented evolution from web development to AI-first agentic advisory, with MLOps as a distinct capability. Minimum engagement starts at $10K. Works best with clients in Retail, SaaS, Healthcare.
Who should choose Endava?
Endava is the right choice for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory.
Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with a UK headquarters, useful for EU/UK-anchored enterprise buyers. Minimum engagement starts at $100K. Works best with clients in Fintech, Retail, Telecom.
Decision matrix: Signity Solutions vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Signity Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Signity Solutions |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Signity Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Signity Solutions vs Endava
| Use case | Signity Solutions fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAG-based knowledge agent advisory | Strong | Limited | Signity Solutions |
| Custom LLM integration strategy | Strong | Limited | Signity Solutions |
| Enterprise AI technology consulting | Limited | Strong | Endava |
| Large-scale systems architecture advisory | Limited | Strong | Endava |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Signity Solutions vs Endava
Signity Solutions (3.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent projects. Documented evolution from web development to AI-first agentic advisory, with MLOps as a distinct capability. It is best for cost-conscious buyers wanting full AI-first advisory, not just a legacy web shop with an AI label.
Endava (3.3/5) is the better choice when enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory. If your situation matches those criteria, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Signity Solutions vs Endava FAQ
Is Signity Solutions better than Endava?
Signity Solutions (3.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Signity Solutions is better for cost-conscious buyers wanting full AI-first advisory, not just a legacy web shop with an AI label. Endava is better for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory.
How do Signity Solutions and Endava differ in pricing?
Signity Solutions uses fixed project, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K. Endava uses retainer, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $100K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Signity Solutions or Endava?
Signity Solutions is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each consultancy before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Signity Solutions and Endava?
Signity Solutions's primary differentiator is: documented evolution from web development to ai-first agentic advisory, with mlops as a distinct capability. Endava's primary differentiator is: publicly traded (nyse: dava) with a uk headquarters, useful for eu/uk-anchored enterprise buyers. They also differ in team size (201-250 vs 11225), minimum engagement ($10K vs $100K), and primary industries served (Retail, SaaS vs Fintech, Retail).