Thoughtworks vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Thoughtworks (4.0/5) edges ahead of Endava (3.3/5) overall. Thoughtworks is the better choice for large enterprises needing agent governance advisory across multi-cloud environments. Endava is the stronger option for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Thoughtworks vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Thoughtworks | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 | 2000 |
| HQ | Chicago, IL, USA | London, UK |
| Team size | 5001-10000 | 11225 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Best for | Large enterprises needing agent governance advisory across multi-cloud environments | Enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory |
| Pricing model | Retainer, dedicated team, T&M | Retainer, dedicated team, T&M |
| Min. engagement | $100K | $100K |
| Primary tech stack | AWS, GCP, Azure | AWS, Azure, Kubernetes |
| Industries served | Fintech, Retail, Manufacturing, Telecom | Fintech, Retail, Telecom |
Thoughtworks vs Endava: overview
Thoughtworks
Thoughtworks was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Chicago, with a workforce exceeding 10,000 across 49 offices in 18 countries. The firm blends design, engineering, and AI advisory, and in June 2026 launched Agent/works to help enterprises govern and run AI agents across any cloud.
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 by John Cotterell in London and is headquartered there, with 11,225 total employees. The company is a publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) technology services firm offering strategy consulting, data insights, systems architecture, automation, software engineering, cloud computing, and AI technology consulting.
Services and capabilities: Thoughtworks vs Endava
| Capability | Thoughtworks | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise automation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agent orchestration | ✓ | ✗ |
| RAG & knowledge agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| Data & analytics agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| LLM integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow integration | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Thoughtworks vs Endava
| Framework / platform | Thoughtworks | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Thoughtworks vs Endava
| Criterion | Thoughtworks | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $100K | $100K |
| Engagement models | Retainer, Dedicated team, T&M | Retainer, Dedicated team, T&M |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Thoughtworks vs Endava
| Dimension | Thoughtworks | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Fintech, Retail, Manufacturing | Fintech, Retail, Telecom |
| Best use cases | Enterprise AI agent governance, Multi-cloud agent orchestration advisory | Enterprise AI technology consulting, Large-scale systems architecture advisory |
| Typical project type | Retainer | Retainer |
Thoughtworks vs Endava: pros and cons
| Thoughtworks | |
|---|---|
| + | 30+ years of engineering-led consulting culture, distinct from pure strategy-only firms |
| + | Named, purpose-built agent governance platform (Agent/works) |
| + | Global scale (49 offices, 18 countries) supports large, distributed programs |
| - | Large-firm structure means less boutique-style senior-partner attention on smaller engagements |
| - | High minimum engagement puts it out of reach for smaller buyers |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with audited financial transparency |
| + | 25+ years of technology consulting history spanning strategy through delivery |
| + | UK headquarters simplifies engagement for European enterprise buyers |
| - | Large-firm structure means less boutique-style senior-partner attention on smaller engagements |
| - | High minimum engagement puts it out of reach for smaller buyers |
Who should choose Thoughtworks?
Thoughtworks is the right choice for large enterprises needing agent governance advisory across multi-cloud environments.
Named agent governance product (Agent/works) purpose-built to run and oversee enterprise AI agents. Minimum engagement starts at $100K. Works best with clients in Fintech, Retail, Manufacturing, Telecom.
Who should choose Endava?
Endava is the right choice for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory.
Publicly traded (NYSE: DAVA) with a UK headquarters, useful for EU/UK-anchored enterprise buyers. Minimum engagement starts at $100K. Works best with clients in Fintech, Retail, Telecom.
Decision matrix: Thoughtworks vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Thoughtworks |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Thoughtworks |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Thoughtworks |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Thoughtworks vs Endava
| Use case | Thoughtworks fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise AI agent governance | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Multi-cloud agent orchestration advisory | Strong | Limited | Thoughtworks |
| Enterprise AI technology consulting | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Large-scale systems architecture advisory | Limited | Strong | Endava |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Thoughtworks vs Endava
Thoughtworks (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent projects. Named agent governance product (Agent/works) purpose-built to run and oversee enterprise AI agents. It is best for large enterprises needing agent governance advisory across multi-cloud environments.
Endava (3.3/5) is the better choice when enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory. If your situation matches those criteria, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Thoughtworks vs Endava FAQ
Is Thoughtworks better than Endava?
Thoughtworks (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Thoughtworks is better for large enterprises needing agent governance advisory across multi-cloud environments. Endava is better for enterprises wanting a publicly traded UK-headquartered technology consultancy for AI advisory.
How do Thoughtworks and Endava differ in pricing?
Thoughtworks uses retainer, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $100K. Endava uses retainer, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $100K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Thoughtworks or Endava?
Thoughtworks is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each consultancy before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Thoughtworks and Endava?
Thoughtworks's primary differentiator is: named agent governance product (agent/works) purpose-built to run and oversee enterprise ai agents. Endava's primary differentiator is: publicly traded (nyse: dava) with a uk headquarters, useful for eu/uk-anchored enterprise buyers. They also differ in team size (5001-10000 vs 11225), minimum engagement ($100K vs $100K), and primary industries served (Fintech, Retail vs Fintech, Retail).